RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02738
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 2 Dec 10 and 4 Mar 11 be
declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management
System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He had a medical condition, which precluded him from obtaining a
satisfactory overall rating on the contested FAs. This medical
condition derived from a surgery he had in 2003 to remove excess
skin from a significant weight loss. However, the surgery
caused severe scaring and deformities to his waist. This in
turn consistently caused him to fail the AC Abdominal
Circumference (AC) component, with waist measurements between
39-42 (depending on the person taking the measurement).
In support of his appeal the applicant submits an AF FM 469,
Duty Limiting Condition Report, a letter of intent for surgery,
and a Physician Discharge Summary that indicate a pre-existing
medical condition. On Apr 2013 the applicant had a surgical
procedure accomplished to resolve the medical issue.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of Master Sergeant (E-7).
On 2 Dec 10, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an
overall composite score of 72.50, which constituted an
unsatisfactory assessment. The applicant was credited with
the following composite scores: Cardio 12:50/47.20, Abdominal
Circumference 41.50/6.80 points, Push-ups 41/8.50 points,
Sit-ups 55/10.00 points.
On 4 Mar 11, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an
overall composite score of 76.80, which constituted an
unsatisfactory assessment. The applicant was credited with
the following composite scores: Cardio 12:43/47.20, Abdominal
Circumference 40.00/10.60 points, Push-ups - 46/9.00 points,
Sit-ups 58/10.00 points.
On 12 Jun 12 a memorandum was sent from his medical provider to
the applicants commander stating that the applicant was
evaluated and will be undergoing medically necessary surgery.
On 11 Jul 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report,
was initiated from his Medical Provider, and states no
abdominal circumference measurements. The release date for the
recommendations was 30 Jun 13.
On 18 Apr 13, a Physicians Discharge Summary, indicates the
applicant was seen by the XXXXXXX Military Medical (SAMMC) for
scar abnormality. A review of his medical history during this
visit indicates the applicant underwent an abdominoplasty in
2003, after having lost 150 pounds. The review goes on to
indicate the applicant had significant irregularity of his
incision, as well as, abnormal distribution of his remaining
underlying fat. As a result of his visit with SAMMC, Plastic
Surgery, applicant was scheduled for surgery to treat the
medical condition.
A list of the applicants last 10 FA results is as follows:
Date
Composite
Score
Abdominal
Circumference
Rating
25 Jul 13
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
26 Feb 13
78.25
Exempt
Satisfactory
28 Aug 12
77.13
Exempt
Satisfactory
9 Jan 12
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
27 Jun 11
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
*4 Mar 11
76.80
40.00/10.60
Unsatisfactory
*2 Dec 10
72.50
41.50/6.80
Unsatisfactory
11 Mar 10
78.50
39.50/21.25
Good
12 Mar 09
80.00
39.50/21.25
Good
9 Apr 09
78.50
40.00/21.00
Good
*Contested FAs
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to
remove the contested FA in AFFMS; however, they recommend
changing the applicants AC component to Exempt. If exempted,
the applicants composite scores would be 82.12 (Satisfactory)
and 82.75 (Satisfactory). DPSIM comments that the applicant
provided documentation that validated he had a medical condition
that affected his ability to pass the AC component of the FA.
The documentation indicates the abdominal scarring likely
distorted his AC measurements. As a result we have concluded
that the recorded AC scores are not an accurate reflection of
applicant's abdominal circumference.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments,
is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was
forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 13 for review and comment
within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received
by this office (Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant
partial relief. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of
record and noting the applicants contentions, we agree with the
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the contested FAs should not be declared void;
however, the AC component scores should be changed to reflect an
Exempt status. The applicant has provided documentation
validating he had a medical condition that affected his ability
to pass the AC component of the FAs and indicates that abdominal
scarring distorted his AC measurements. In view of the
applicants medical condition and noting his passing scores on
all other components of the contested FAs, we find a totality of
the evidence supports favorable consideration of this request.
We note that as a result of our proposed corrective action, the
applicants composite scores will be rescored, resulting in
overall satisfactory scores of 82.12 and 82.75. Therefore, we
recommend the applicants records be corrected as indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the
Fitness Assessments, dated 2 December 2010 and 4 March 2011, be
amended in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS) to
reflect that he was Exempt from the abdominal circumference
components.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-02738 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Chair
, Vice Chair
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-02738 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Jun 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 4 Sep 13 w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 13.
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01762
On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicants contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01360
On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicants contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01944
The updated AFFMS record indicates applicant continued to achieve unsatisfactory scores due to a composite score of 69.5 on both contested FAs. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 5 Nov 13 70.00 Unsatisfactory 29 May 13 81.5 Satisfactory 27 Jul 12 Exempt Exempt *30 May 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory *2 Mar 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board corrected the AFFMS records to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000
DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02592
from the Unit CC; and Atch 1, Para 13 If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results. The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Measurement Rating 2 Aug 2013 82.20 38.00 Satisfactory 15 May 2013 16.50 39.50 Unsatisfactory 6 Nov 2012 83.30 38.50 Satisfactory *24 Oct 2012 0.00 40.00 Unsatisfactory 30 Jul 2012 74.10 39.00 Unsatisfactory *Annotates Contested FA: On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04155
Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04155
Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01410
To support his appeal the applicant provides an AF FM 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status; multiple Standard FM 600s, Record of Medical Care, reflecting that he saw his Primary Care Manager (PCM) numerous times about neck and back pain starting from 11 Mar 10 to 12 Mar 2012; two memoranda from his radiologist indicating the applicant had a medical issue with his spine; and a Physician Discharge Summary. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02277
On 24 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 64.40 unsatisfactory due to failure to achieve minimum requirements on the AC. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submitted; a memorandum from the FAC validating that she in fact asked for a re-tape by another...